Legal Opinion

Danbeck v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2001No. 99-1142PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiane S. Sykes, J.

¶ 1. This case involves an insurance dispute and requires us to interpret language in an underinsured motorist (UIM) policy that obligates the UIM carrier to pay benefits to its insured only after the underinsured motorist's liability limits "have been exhausted by payment of judgements or settlements." The question is whether the policy's exhaustion requirement can be satisfied by a settlement with the underinsured motorist's insurer for less than liability limits, plus a credit to the UIM carrier for the difference. We conclude that the unambiguous language of the insurance policy precludes…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Wisconsin Label Corp. v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Frost Ex Rel. Anderson v. WhitbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LangridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Seitzinger v. Community Health NetworkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API