Legal Opinion
Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1998No. 97-0659PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.
¶1. Petitioner Betty L. Hull (Hull) seeks review of a court of appeals decision 1 affirming an order of the Fond du Lac County Circuit Court, the Honorable Henry B. Buslee presiding, in which the court dismissed Hull's complaint and entered a declaratory judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). Hull claimed that she was entitled to uninsured motorist (UM) benefits under her two State Farm liability insurance policies because the owner of the vehicle which struck and killed her husband was uninsured. Relying on Hemerley v. American Family Mutual…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Stockbridge School District v. Department of Public Instruction School District Boundary Appeal BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Dowhower v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.