Legal Opinion

Talmage v. Medtronic, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1982No. 81-265PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

Relators, Medtronic, Inc. and its workers’ compensation insurer, seek review of a decision of a divided Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals awarding employee compensation for continuing temporary total disability. Relators contend that several findings underlying the award are without adequate support in the evidence. Our review of the record leads us to the contrary conclusion.

Employee worked for several years in Medtronic’s pacemaker-repair department. On October 28, 1976, she was installing a belt on the rollers of an upright sander when the machine accidentally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brening v. Roto-Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Findorff v. Pinkerton's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Turay v. Allied Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Gaspers v. Minneapolis Electric Steel Castings Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Holliday v. Rush Products Division of Lake Center IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Savina v. Litton Industries/Litton Medical SystemsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Flowers v. Consolidated Container Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Erickson Ex Rel. Erickson v. Gopher Masonry, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Guggenberger v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API