Legal Opinion

Findorff v. Pinkerton's, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1980No. 50707PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Petitioner Ray G. Findorff appeals from a decision by a divided Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals, holding him not entitled to either permanent or temporary total disability benefits as a result of a work-related injury to his right arm on February 3, 1976. The Court of Appeals affirmed the compensation judge’s award of $4,590 for a 25% permanent partial disability of his arm, and ordered the employer and insurer to continue to provide necessary medical treatment. We affirm.

The fact that a person has worked, as this remarkable man did, long past retirement age, does not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Saenger v. Liberty Carton Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Henry v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Scott v. Southview Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Brening v. Roto-Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Talmage v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Saenger v. Liberty Carton Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Shogren v. Bethesda Lutheran Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Behrens v. City of FairmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API