Legal Opinion

Guggenberger v. Cold Spring Granite Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1983No. C5-82-533PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

The employer seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals awarding the employee $16,879 in permanent partial disability benefits for a 20 percent impairment of his lungs due to work-related silicosis, as well as necessary and reasonable medical expenses. Because the employee’s last exposure to silica dust and other irritants occurred in 1965, we reverse on the ground that the claim was barred by the statute of repose provisions of Minn.Stat. § 176.66, subd. 3 (1971).

Respondent, Norbert Guggenberger, has worked for relator, Cold Spring Granite…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Klimmek v. Independent School District No. 487Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Graber v. Peter Lametti Construction CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Abram v. Art Goebel FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Notch v. Victory Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Talmage v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moes v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Schnurrer v. Hoerner-WaldorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Guggenberger v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API