Legal Opinion
Holliday v. Rush Products Division of Lake Center Industries
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 1979No. 48627PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Justice.
This workers’ compensation case was heard before the Workers’ Compensation Division. The compensation judge found for the employee on all issues and the rela-tors appealed. The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirmed the decision, one judge dissenting. Relators then filed a petition for a writ of certiorari which was granted by this court. We affirm.
Employee Kathleen M. Holliday was born in England in 1916. After graduating from high school she painted pottery in a factory for 9 years and then, during the war, worked as an electrician for an aircraft factory for five…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Fisher v. RED & WHITE TAXI COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Brening v. Roto-Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Briggs v. K. W. McKee, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- King v. Werner Continental, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Talmage v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Holliday v. Rush Products Division of Lake Center IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Talmage v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982