Legal Opinion

Savina v. Litton Industries/Litton Medical Systems

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1983No. C7-82-162PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Employer, Litton Industries/Litton Medical Systems (Litton), seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals awarding employee compensation for permanent partial disability. Litton contends that, because the employee’s claim petition was filed more than 6 years after the date of the accident, the employee’s claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, Minn.Stat. § 176.151(1) (1982). It is not disputed that the employee did not formally commence a proceeding to recover workers’ compensation benefits until over 7 years after the date…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knopp v. GuttermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Lemke v. Knudsen Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Talmage v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Weidemann v. Kemper Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marose v. Maislin TransportSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Neuberger v. Hennepin County WorkhouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Roemhildt v. Gresser Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. TraczykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API