Legal Opinion

Clark v. Township of Falls

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 88-3625PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NEWCOMER, District Judge.

This is an action for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff David Clark, a police lieutenant employed by defendant Falls Township, claims that defendants deprived him of various first amendment rights and certain alleged property interests in his job. Clark has moved to compel production of an independent investigative report of the Falls Township Police Department. Defendant Township opposes the motion and submitted certain portions of the report to the court for in camera inspection. For the reasons discussed here*92in, the court will grant the motion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Wood v. BreierDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
  3. Spell v. McDanielDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1984
  4. Crawford v. DominicDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Mercy v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Texaco Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Department of Consumer AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Everitt v. BrezzelDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
  3. Castle v. JallahDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  4. Ciarlone v. City of ReadingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Curtis v. McHenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API