Legal Opinion

Everitt v. Brezzel

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided November 15, 1990No. 89-N-884PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NOTTINGHAM, District Judge.

Plaintiff has brought claims against certain Denver police officers, the City and County of Denver, its mayor, its manager of safety, and its chief of police. The lawsuit is in federal court because the claims include allegations that defendants have violated plaintiff’s civil rights and are thus liable for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). The case is now before the court on plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery of information from internal police department files. The discovery dispute cannot be understood without a brief…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tuite v. HenryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  2. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Midland Bancor, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  3. Dorato ex rel. Wrongful Death Claim of Tillison v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  4. Torres v. KuzniaszDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  5. Era Franchise Systems, Inc. v. Northern Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API