Legal Opinion

Curtis v. McHenry

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 1997No. Civil Action No. 95-270 EriePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This is a section 1983 claim against members of the Pennsylvania State Police. Presently pending before this Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of police reports which the Defendants claim are privileged under the Pennsylvania Criminal History Records Information Act (PCHRIA), 18 Pa. C.S.A. §§ 9101 et seq. We find no authority for recognizing the claimed .privilege under Federal Rule of Evidence 501 and grant Plaintiffs’ motion.

I

Plaintiffs are proceeding on the state created danger theory. Plaintiffs claim, in short, that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Clark v. Township of FallsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Joseph F. O'Neill and Frank A. ScafidiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Siegfried v. City of EastonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Clark v. Township of FallsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Benedict v. McMahonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. In re Pittsburgh Citizen Police Review Board, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2010
  3. BARTON v. TRANS UNION, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. In Re: Subpoenas In case of Mielcarz v. PietzschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. KENNEDY v. GETTYSBURG COLLEGEDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API