Legal Opinion
Castle v. Jallah
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 23, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 91-422-NPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*619OPINION AND ORDER
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate, has submitted a pro se complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to redress alleged violations of his constitutional rights.
Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint
By order filed March 18, 1992, this court granted plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint to include new counts and join additional defendants. The court directed the newly-joined defendants to file responsive pleadings within twenty-three (23) days from the date of that order. The Attorney General’s Office then notified this court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- King v. CondeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Charles L. Kirby v. Stanley Blackledge, Warden of Central Prison, and v. Lee Bounds, Commissioner of the North Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Singletary v. Sterling Transport Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- HDSherer LLC v. Natural Molecular Testing Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
- Sherrill v. Dio Transport, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
- Finley v. TrentDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1997
- Philip Morris Co. v. American Broadcasting Co.Richmond County Circuit Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.