State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Carpenter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer the issues to be decided are: (1) Is *1126the record, consisting of the stipulated facts, a trial transcript and two depositions, sufficient for a meaningful de novo consideration of the disciplinary proceeding’s disposition? and (2) Is a six-month suspension, to be followed by a two-and-one-half-year post-reinstatement probation, an appropriate disciplinary sanction to be imposed for respondent’s professional misconduct? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
The Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar] charged Bob Carpenter [Carpenter or…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State v. MadisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LivsheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.