Legal Opinion

State v. Madison

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 1, 1995No. 95-046PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Per curiam

Today, we consider whether use of the term “review de novo” in the recently approved bail amendment to the Vermont Constitution (Proposal 7) and related legislation, 13 V.S.A. § 7556(d), requires a justice of this Court, when reviewing a district court’s decision denying bail, to conduct a new evidentiary hearing without considering the record created in the district court. We conclude that the bail amendment, which allows the district court to deny bail to a person charged with a violent felony if evidence of guilt is great and the accused poses a substantial threat of violence to another…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Daniel Loconte v. Richard Dugger, Robert A. ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. United States v. Claude S. BirtleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Town of Killington v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. The Travelers Insurance Company v. Susan J. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. N.A.S. Holdings, Inc. v. PafundiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. Swett v. Haig's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. MacDonough-Webster Lodge No. 26 v. WellsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API