Legal Opinion
United States v. Kinard
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided April 14, 1972No. 24,227PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Duncan, Judge:
We granted review of the appellant’s case to consider two allegations of error:
I. Whether the rights of the appellant under Article 38 and the Sixth Amendment were violated when he was forced to go to trial without adequate opportunity to procure civilian counsel.
II. Whether the issue of appellant being afforded sufficient opportunities to procure individual counsel was resolved against the appellant entirely on the basis of very dubious hearsay evidence.
An exposition of the numerous charges upon which the appellant has been found guilty is unnecessary for a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. EasonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. KilbyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. MontoyaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. PerryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.