Legal Opinion

Todd's Ice Cream, Inc. v. South Carolina Employment Security Commission

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 19, 1984No. 0129PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

This is an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s decision finding that the combination truck drivers-salesmen of the appellant-Todd’s Ice Cream, Inc., (Todd’s) were employees rather than independent contractors. If employees, Todd’s must pay unemployment taxes on the wages it pays to the drivers. We affirm.

Todd’s is in the ice cream business. It hires drivers-salesmen who drive the ice cream trucks owned by Todd’s and sell Todd’s products. Each driver signs an agreement with Todd’s which refers to the driver as a “contractor” and states that an independent contractor-employer relationship…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Young v. WarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  3. Anderson Ex Rel. Estate of Anderson v. WestSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Chavis v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  5. DeBerry v. Coker Freight LinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kilgore Group, Inc. v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Felts v. Richland CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Professional Samplers, Inc. v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. DeGroot v. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Roach v. Combined Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API