Legal Opinion

Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 12, 1981No. 21410PublishedCited by 344 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Chief Justice:

This Workmen’s Compensation case raises two questions for consideration: (1) whether or not the Administrative Procedures Act (Section 1-23-310 et seq., South Carolina Code of Laws, 1976) requires a change in the scope of judicial review of factual determinations by the Industrial Commission; and (2) the sufficiency of the evidence in this case to support the Commission’s award in favor of the respondent-claimant. The appeal is from an order of the lower court affirming the award of the Commission. We affirm.

Initially appellant argues that the adoption of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Dickinson-Tidewater, Inc. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Law v. Richland County School District No. 1Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Murdaugh v. Robert Lee Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. Colvin v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by344 opinions

  1. Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Palmetto Alliance, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

339 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API