Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, Chief Justice:
This Workmen’s Compensation case raises two questions for consideration: (1) whether or not the Administrative Procedures Act (Section 1-23-310 et seq., South Carolina Code of Laws, 1976) requires a change in the scope of judicial review of factual determinations by the Industrial Commission; and (2) the sufficiency of the evidence in this case to support the Commission’s award in favor of the respondent-claimant. The appeal is from an order of the lower court affirming the award of the Commission. We affirm.
Initially appellant argues that the adoption of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dickinson-Tidewater, Inc. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Law v. Richland County School District No. 1Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Murdaugh v. Robert Lee Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Colvin v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by344 opinions
- Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Palmetto Alliance, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
339 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.