Legal Opinion
Roach v. Combined Utility Commission
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided November 17, 1986No. 0818PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
The plaintiffs, individually and as representatives of the Powdersville Community Protection Group, commenced this action for an injunction against construction of a waste water treatment plant by the Combined Utility Commission of the City of Easley. The trial judge denied the injunction. The plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.
Planning for the construction of the Middle Branch Treatment Plant sewage facility for the City of Easley in Pickens County began in 1975-76. The site selected for this plant was actually three or four miles from Easley near the Anderson County community of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Childs v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Arnold v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Strong v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Neal v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Village of Los Ranchos de Albuquerque v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- County of Richland v. SimpkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- FOC Lawshe Ltd. Partnership v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- MailSource, LLC v. M.A. Bailey & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Steffensen-WC, LLC v. Volunteers of America of Utah, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2016