DeGroot v. Employment Security Commission
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Shaw, Judge:
This is an action for unemployment insurance benefits. Respondent Fellers and Associates discharged appellant Mary K. DeGroot. An Appeals Referee found DeGroot was discharged due to inability, a non-disqualifying condition. Respondent Employment Security Commission reversed, finding DeGroot was discharged for misconduct, and held she was not entitled to benefits. The circuit court affirmed. This appeal raises two question: (1) is there sufficient evidence to support the Commission’s finding, and (2) did the Commis sion deny DeGroot due process by reviewing the case in her absence?…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Law v. Richland County School District No. 1Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Ellis v. Spartan MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Todd's Ice Cream, Inc. v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Lee v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- Wellington v. S. C. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ross v. Medical Univ. of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Grayson v. Carter Rhoad FurnitureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Milliken & Co. v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- Mickens v. Southland Exchange-Joint VentureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Mickens v. Southland Exchange-Joint VentureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991