Legal Opinion

DeGroot v. Employment Security Commission

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 1985No. 0433PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

This is an action for unemployment insurance benefits. Respondent Fellers and Associates discharged appellant Mary K. DeGroot. An Appeals Referee found DeGroot was discharged due to inability, a non-disqualifying condition. Respondent Employment Security Commission reversed, finding DeGroot was discharged for misconduct, and held she was not entitled to benefits. The circuit court affirmed. This appeal raises two question: (1) is there sufficient evidence to support the Commission’s finding, and (2) did the Commis sion deny DeGroot due process by reviewing the case in her absence?…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Law v. Richland County School District No. 1Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  2. Ellis v. Spartan MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Todd's Ice Cream, Inc. v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Lee v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  5. Wellington v. S. C. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ross v. Medical Univ. of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Grayson v. Carter Rhoad FurnitureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Milliken & Co. v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Mickens v. Southland Exchange-Joint VentureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Mickens v. Southland Exchange-Joint VentureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API