Legal Opinion
Felts v. Richland County
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided August 14, 1989No. 1367PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
In his petition for rehearing Clarence E. Felts, Jr., asserts this court (1) applied an incorrect standard of review of the facts and (2) failed to consider the argument that he could be an employee of both the Township Auditorium and Richland County. We have reconsidered the record in light of his arguments but still conclude the trial court should be affirmed. The petition for rehearing is denied. The following amended opinion is. substituted for the opinion previously filed.
Cureton, Judge:
Appellant — Clarence E. Felts, Jr. sought a declaratory judgment that he was an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Young v. WarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Anderson Ex Rel. Estate of Anderson v. WestSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Chavis v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Edmisten v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Watkins v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. Man Industries (INDIA), Ltd, Prime Pipe International, Inc., and the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- Barnacle Broadcasting, Inc. v. Baker Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- United States Fire Insurance v. MacLoskieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Harvey v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.