Legal Opinion

DeBerry v. Coker Freight Lines

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 13, 1959No. 17523PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

This is a proceeding for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Section 72-1 et seq., Code of 1952, instituted by Ben J. DeBerry, respondent, against Coker Freight Lines, and its insurance carrier, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, the appellants herein. The respondent asserts that he was an employee of Coker Freight Lines and that he received an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The appellants assert that the respondent was not an employee of Coker Freight Lines within the meaning of the Compensation Act.

The question of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Hodges v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1943
  3. Brown v. L. H. Bottoms Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Kimble v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Adams v. Davison-Paxon Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Young v. WarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  2. Wynn v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Matkins v. Zero Refrigerated Lines, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Watkins v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Todd's Ice Cream, Inc. v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API