Ott Hardware Co. v. Holmberg
California Court of Appeal
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County substituting party defendant and directing collection of warrant and deposit of money in court. Samuel E. Crow, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
The controversy between the parties hereto having run a prolonged course through the trial and appellate courts, is again here on two appeals, both taken by the defendant. As the questions involved are practically the same in both cases, the appeals may well be considered together. The first appeal, that numbered 2494, is an appeal taken from an order substituting A. C. Holmberg, city clerk and city auditor of the city of Santa Barbara as defendant, in the place and stead of Alfred Davis, the former city clerk and auditor. The second appeal, that numbered 2440, is an appeal taken from an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex parte TinkumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Ott Hardware Co. v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Jordan v. HubertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Ott Hardware Co. v. HolmbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- First National Bank v. HirningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Boise-Kuna Irrigation District v. HartsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Romero Moreno v. GoreSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934
- Romero Moreno v. GoreSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934