Legal Opinion

Ex parte Tinkum

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 10,479PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Application for discharge upon a writ of habeas corpus. The facts arc stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

In bank, McKee, J.:

The petitioner is imprisoned under an order of the Superior Court of Mono County, adjudging him guilty of contempt of Court for disobeying a peremptory writ of mandate issued upon a judgment rendered by the late District Court of Mono County on the 17th of November, 1879.

But the records show that the judgment was rendered in an action originally commenced by one Albert Mack against Andrew H. Allen, Treasurer of the County of Mono, for a writ of mandamus to compel the said Treasurer to pay a certain audited warrant, drawn upon the treasury of the county, out of the general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Judson v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Lindsey v. AuditorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. George v. BeatyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Board of Supervisors v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Ott Hardware Co. v. HolmbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Romero Moreno v. GoreSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934
  5. Wood, Mayor v. MorrisettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API