Ott Hardware Co. v. Holmberg
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, and an order denying a motion to have another and different judgment entered upon the findings. S. E. Crow, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
These appeals, one from the judgment and the other from an order of court denying defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment entered and render a different judgment upon the findings, were taken by Alfred Davis, as the then city clerk and auditor of the city of Santa Barbara, for whom, upon suggestion of his death, A. C. Holmberg, his successor in office, has, by orders made pursuant to rule XVI of the supreme court, [160 Cal. li, 119 Pac. xii], been substituted as appellant.
The facts upon which this proceeding for the issuance of a writ of mandate to be directed to the city clerk and auditor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Carter v. TilghmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Ott Hardware Co. v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Little v. Emmett Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Ott Hardware Co. v. HolmbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- City of Bakersfield v. West Park Home Owners Assn. and FriendsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016