Legal Opinion
Ott Hardware Co. v. Davis
California Supreme Court
Decided August 19, 1913No. L.A. No. 3112PublishedCited by 7 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. E. P. Unangst, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion, of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This appeal was originally heard in the district court of appeal for the second appellate district. The justices of that court being unable to agree upon a decision, the cause was transferred to this court.
Our consideration of the record and the arguments advanced has convinced us of the soundness of the views expressed in the opinion of Shaw, J., concurred in by Allen, P. J., and we hereby adopt said opinion.
The opinion reads as follows:
“This was a proceeding the purpose of which was to obtain a writ of mandate commanding defendant, as auditor of the city of Santa Barbara, to draw…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Village of Fort Edward v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Board of Supervisors v. . EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Payne v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People of the State of N.Y. v. . FieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- McEvers v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Ott Hardware Co. v. HolmbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Ott Hardware Co. v. HolmbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.