Legal Opinion
Boise-Kuna Irrigation District v. Hartson
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1929No. Nos. 5480, 5481PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BABCOCK, District Judge,
— The plaintiffs filed two verified complaints in this court, one to obtain a writ of mandate against the defendant, Clinton H. Hartson, Judge of the district court of the third judicial district, and the other to obtain a writ of prohibition against said judge and W. E. Welsh, water-master of District 12-A, Boise River.
Orders were made fixing a time for hearing thereof, upon notice to show cause why such writ should not issue, both returnable at the same time.
The allegations of the complaints are practically the same in each case. By the mandamus proceeding the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Irwin v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- United States Ex Rel. Bernardin v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Marshall v. DyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Murphy v. UtterSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doolittle v. EckertIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Payette County v. BaldridgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Doolittle v. EckertIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- State Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Lee CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981