Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Hubert

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,055PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment refusing to grant a writ of mandamus, in the Fifteenth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Dwinelle, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Department No. 2, Sharpstein, J.:

The plaintiff, under a contract with the Board of City Hall Commissioners of San Francisco, performed certain work upon the New City Hall, for which he received, prior to January 24th, 1875, five City Hall warrants for various sums, each of which was registered by the Treasurer of the City and County of San Francisco soon after it was issued. On the 21st of July, 1876, the plaintiff presented said warrants to the defendant, who was then Treasurer of said city and county, and demanded payment of the principal, together with interest thereon from the dates of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ott Hardware Co. v. HolmbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  2. Romero Moreno v. GoreSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934
  3. Romero Moreno v. GoreSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API