Legal Opinion

People v. One 1939 Buick Coupe

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1942No. Civ. 13791PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

One 1939 Buick coupe, having been seized by a law enforcing agency under the belief that it was being used to transport marihuana in violation of section 11610 of the Health and Safety Code, it was adjudged, following a trial, that the interest of the registered owner be forfeited to the State but that the lien held by defendant bank was valid. The Department of Finance was directed to sell the car and to satisfy the lien of the bank. .From such judgment the plaintiff has appealed.

The sole question for determination is whether there is substantial, evidential support for the finding that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. One 1939 Plymouth 6 CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. People v. One Plymouth SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. People v. One 1937 Packard 6 Touring SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. One 1940 Buick 8 SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. One 1941 Cadillac Club CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. People v. One 1941 Buick Club CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. People v. One 1949 Ford Tudor SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Reese v. Hung Kim WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API