Legal Opinion

People v. One Plymouth Sedan

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1937No. Civ. 10402, 10420PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

—Plaintiff commenced proceedings to forfeit the defendant automobile on the ground of unlawfully transporting narcotics. Pursuant to the state Narcotic Act, section 15, the following persons were notified of the proceeding, namely, J. D. Bollerino, the registered owner; Rice Securities Co. and Garden City Finance Co., the legal owners; and George Cleland, a party who might have an interest therein. The registered owner, J. D. Bollerino, filed an answer in which he denied that the automobile had been unlawfully used to transport narcotics. He set up his interest under a conditional sales…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chastain's, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. One 1940 Buick 8 SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. People v. One 1941 Cadillac Club CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Boland v. CecilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. People v. One 1939 Buick CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API