Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. One 1941 Buick Club Coupe

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1946No. Civ. 14887PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, P. J.

In a proceeding instituted by the State to forfeit the interest of the registered and legal owners in a seized automobile which, it was charged, was used to conceal and transport marihuana in violation of section 11610 of the Health and Safety Code, judgment was rendered in favor of the State free of the lien of the legal owner, from which judgment the legal owner of the vehicle appeals.

The registered owners of the vehicle were Willie L. Bowens and Mary L. Bowens, while Fred W. Gray, doing business as Fred W. Gray Company, was the legal owner. Both owners filed answers to the notice of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. One 1940 Buick 8 SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. One 1939 Buick CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People v. One 1937 Packard 6 Touring SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. One 1948 Chevrolet Convertible CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Caccamo v. SwanstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Amrani-Khaldi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. People v. One 1948 Chevrolet Conv. CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API