Legal Opinion

Reese v. Hung Kim Wong

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 2001No. A093684PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SWAGER, J.

—A buyerappeals from that portion of a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding him $35,000 in damages from sellers for breach of a contract to sell him certain real property. The amount of the award was based on the difference between the contract price and the fair market value of the property at the time of the breach. (Civ. Code, § 3306 (hereafter section 3306).) The buyer contends the trial court should have instructed that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and fair market value of the property at the time of trial. We conclude that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greenwich S.F., LLC v. WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Real Estate Analytics, LLC v. VallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. California Fair Plan Ass'n v. GarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Horning v. ShilbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API