Legal Opinion

Martin v. Texaco, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided February 7, 1985No. TCA 84-7081-WSPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STAFFORD, Chief Judge.

At the pre-trial conference held in this case on February 1, 1985, the court left open the issue of strict compliance with the notice requirements of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (“PMPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2801-2806. After reviewing the trial memoranda and the relevant case law, and hearing argument of counsel, the court determines that both of the following questions should be submitted to the jury: (1) whether plaintiff received the summary statement and, if he did not, (2) was he thereby deprived of adequate notification.

Plaintiff denies having received the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leon Thompson v. Kerr-Mcgee Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  2. Blankenship v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1979
  3. Brown v. American Petrofina Marketing, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1983
  4. Daniels v. Dilmar Oil Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1980
  5. Mobil Oil Corp. v. VachonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Seahorse Marine Supplies, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Brown v. Magness Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1985
  3. Grotemeyer v. Lake Shore Petro Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  4. Amadeo v. Mobil Oil Caribe, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1986
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. A.Z. Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API