Legal Opinion
Brown v. Magness Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 27, 1985No. Civ. A. G-85-8PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HUGH GIBSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, William T. Brown, seeks damages and injunctive relief against the defendant Magness Company, Inc., for its failure to renew a lease agreement covering an Exxon service station operated by the plaintiff.
On July 17, 1985, the Court heard plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction which, by the parties’ agreement, was extended to cover all declaratory and permanent injunctive relief. Having considered all evidence presented and counsel’s arguments, the Court now makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leon Thompson v. Kerr-Mcgee Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Meyer v. Amerada Hess Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- Lasko v. Consumers Petroleum of Connecticut, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
- Ferriola v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kesselman v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Seahorse Marine Supplies, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Charles H. Desfosses v. Wallace Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Hilo v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Coast Village, Inc. v. Equilon Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Razavi v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.