Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 24, 1979No. Civ. 79-498PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BELLONI, District Judge:

This suit is brought under the new Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (hereinafter the Act), 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq., enacted and effective June 19, 1978. The Act is intended to protect the franchised retailers of motor fuel from arbitrary or unfair terminations or nonrenewals of the franchises by the franchisors. 1 The Act outlines the circumstances under which termination or renewal is permissible and the procedures a franchisor must follow. 2 This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 2805(a). Jurisdiction over the parties and venue in this district…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Saad v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
  2. Ted's Tire Service Inc. v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
  3. Gilderhus v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
  4. Frisard v. Texaco Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Leon Thompson v. Kerr-Mcgee Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  2. Charles H. Desfosses v. Wallace Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Davis v. Gulf Oil Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Davy v. Murphy Oil Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
  5. Luis Escobar D/B/A Tropical Service Center v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API