Legal Opinion
Brock v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided January 24, 1939No. L. A. 16635PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
By this proceeding in prohibition, the Director of Agriculture, certain officers of that department, and a number of growers of citrus fruits who are members of committees appointed for the administration of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of this state (Stats. 1935, p. 1032; Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 146), seek to compel the respondent Superior Court to dissolve a temporary injunction which was issued in an action brought against them by Harry W. Forbes and others to enjoin the enforcement of a plan for the regulation of intrastate marketing of grapefruit. They contend that the validity of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of EmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. WingoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- We The People Nevada ex rel. Angle v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.