Legal Opinion
500, LLC v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 25, 2013No. A11-1705PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether an application to a heritage-preservation commission for a certificate of appropriateness is a “written request relating to zoning” under Minn.Stat. § 15.99, subd. 2(a) (2012). If so, then the respondent, City of Minneapolis (“the City”), had only 60 days to “approve or deny” the application for a certificate of appropriateness submitted by the appellant, 500, LLC (“500 LLC”). See Minn.Stat. § 15.99, subd. 2(a). Because we conclude that an application for a certificate of appropriateness is a “written request relating to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. PakhnyukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Ali M. Shire v. Rosemount, Inc., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC, Relators, and Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., Crosstown Surgery Center, and Minnesota Department of Human Services/BRS, Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Gen. Mills, Inc. v. Comm'r RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.