Breza v. City of Minnetrista
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s decision to grant respondent’s petition for a writ of mandamus. Appellant contends that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to consider respondent’s petition because respondent did not appeal to the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) before petitioning the district court for a writ of mandamus. But because appellant failed to make a decision on respondent’s exemption application within 60 days, as required by Minn.Stat. § 15.99 (2004), appellant lost the ability to act on that application. Therefore,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Demolition Landfill Services, LLC v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re ThulinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Breza v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In re Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018