Legal Opinion
Karantonis v. Town of East Hartford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 27, 2002No. AC 22222PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*860 Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiff, Paul Karantonis, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant, town of East Hartford (town), in this action for forcible entry and detainer brought pursuant to General Statutes § 47a-43.1 On appeal, Karantonis claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that he did not have possession of the property and (2) failed to find a forcible entry and detainer under § 47a-43. The town argues, inter alia, as an alternate ground for affirmance, that Karantonis’ action was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. ShashatySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Berlingo v. Sterling Ocean House, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Carrier v. CarrierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Delfino v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
3Cited by10 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. PalumboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Lind-Larsen v. Fleet National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Fleming v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Czaplicki v. OgrenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Durso v. VessichioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.