Legal Opinion

Czaplicki v. Ogren

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 8, 2005No. AC 25037PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The defendants, Craig Ogren and OVL Manufacturing, Inc. (OVL), appeal, and the plaintiffs, Gayl Czaplicki, Philip Czaplicki and Falcon Machine Products, Inc. (Falcon), cross appeal following a consolidated trial to the court of two actions 1 arising out of a dispute over the parties’ rights and obligations with respect to an industrial building in Berlin. The defendant claims that in Czaplicki v. Ogren (joint venture case), the trial court improperly rejected his counterclaim that alleged that Gayl Czaplicki breached the joint venture agreement and that in Falcon Machine…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. SnyderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Argentinis v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Ames v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Colliers, Dow & Condon, Inc. v. SchwartzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Reader v. CassarinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sproviero v. J.M. Scott Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. v. Property Operating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. RENT-A-PC, INC. v. Rental Management, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Fleming v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Romanczak v. AvalonBay Communities, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API