Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Palumbo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 18, 2010No. SC 18276PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the judgment of the trial court concluding that the plaintiff, Allstate Insurance Company, could hold the named defendant, Stephen Palumbo (defendant),1 liable under the doctrine of equitable subrogation to recover damages the plaintiff had paid under a homeowner’s insurance policy issued to its insured, the defendant’s fiancée, with whom he lived. See Allstate Ins. Co. v. Palumbo, 109 Conn. App. 731, 952 A.2d 819 (2008). The defendant contends that, in light of the particular facts of the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Home Insurance Company v. Pinski Brothers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Salzman v. BachrachSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Stamford Hospital v. VegaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Champion Steel, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Channing Real Estate, LLC v. GatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Russo v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- EQUICREDIT CORP. OF CONNECTICUT v. KasperConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- 300 State, LLC v. HanafinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.