Legal Opinion
Fleming v. City of Bridgeport
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 29, 2005No. AC 24640PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEST, J.
The plaintiff Sylvia Fleming 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the defendants, the city of Bridgeport (city); Sergeant Solomon Holly and Officers Garfield Bums, Juan Gonzalez and David Santos of the Bridgeport police department (police defendants); and James Dixon and Susie Dixon (Dixons). 2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that (1) the Dixons did not violate General Statutes § 47a-43, 3 the entry and detainer statute, (2) the police defendants did not violate the entry and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schnabel v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Colon v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Tuchman v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Prescott v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Reader v. CassarinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fleming v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Sullivan v. DelisaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Wilcox v. FerrainaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Distiso Ex Rel. Distiso v. Town of WolcottDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Fleming v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.