Legal Opinion

Tidal Oil Company v. Flanagan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 28, 1922No. 11209PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Lucien B. Wright, Judge. Action by J. P. Flanagan against the Tidal Oil Company et al. in ejectment and to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKennamek, J.

This action involves the title to 120 acres of land located in Creek county, Okla., originally allotted to Robert Marshall, enrolled as a Creek freedman opposite roll No. 5449. The action was instituted by J. P. Flanagan against the Tidal Oil Company et al., as defendants, to quiet title to the lands and for an accounting as to the amount of oil and gas extracted from the lands .by the defendants. The plaintiff asserted title, to the lands under a general warranty deed dated January 22, 1916, executed' by Robert Marshall, the allottee, purporting to convey to him the lands in controversy, and…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Primrose v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Jefferson v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Vinson v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. Sandlin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Coats v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Miller v. MadiganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API