Legal Opinion

Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. McAlister

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1923No. 14176PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was brought on an insurance policy by Roy McAlister, defendant in error, against Security Insurance Company, of New Haven, Conn., plaintiff in error. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

The defendant filed a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition, which was overruled, and this action of the trial court is assigned as error. The petition did not allege that the plaintiff Was the owner of the automobile insured at the time the insurance policy was insured or at the time of the loss, neither did it allege the value of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Germier v. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  3. North British & Mercantile Ins. v. Luck's Strike Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Strawbridge v. Standard Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Palatine Ins. Co. v. LynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. Trave-Taylor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Alfalfa Electric Coop., Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Davis v. Safe Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Kerr v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API