Legal Opinion
Amodio v. Amodio
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 16, 1999No. SC 15856PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to modify a *726child support award.1 The trial court granted the motion by the defendant, Vincent N. Amodio, to modify the child support order, and on the appeal by the plaintiff, Deborah A. Amodio, the Appellate Court reversed the granting of the motion to modify on the ground that the trial court had lacked subject matter jurisdiction to modify the order. We reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court.
The Appellate Court opinion aptly sets…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Artman v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Fedus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- In re John G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.