City of Cleveland v. Johnson
City of Cleveland Municipal Court
1Opinion of the Court
Emanuella GROves, Judge.
{¶ 1} On July 10, 2004, the defendant, Marion Johnson, was charged with violations of Cleveland Codified Ordinances 604.03(b), “Control of Vicious and Dangerous Dogs,”1 and 604.4, “Insurance; Signs; Notification.”2 The defendant *20was charged because his pit bull dog was running loose. Additionally, the defendant failed to provide proof of required insurance.
{¶ 2} The defendant filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the ordinances are unconstitutional and violate his right to due process. The defendant cited State v. Cowan, 103 Ohio St.3d 144, 2004-Ohio-4777, 814 N.E.2d…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Woods v. TelbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
- State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
- State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
- State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015