Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Johnson

City of Cleveland Municipal Court

Decided February 25, 2005No. 2004 CRB 020778PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Emanuella GROves, Judge.

{¶ 1} On July 10, 2004, the defendant, Marion Johnson, was charged with violations of Cleveland Codified Ordinances 604.03(b), “Control of Vicious and Dangerous Dogs,”1 and 604.4, “Insurance; Signs; Notification.”2 The defendant *20was charged because his pit bull dog was running loose. Additionally, the defendant failed to provide proof of required insurance.

{¶ 2} The defendant filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the ordinances are unconstitutional and violate his right to due process. The defendant cited State v. Cowan, 103 Ohio St.3d 144, 2004-Ohio-4777, 814 N.E.2d…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Woods v. TelbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API