Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim Blatt

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2015No. 14-0757Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLoughry, Justice

Apparently, from the majority’s coign of vantage, the citizens of this State do not deserve the same protection from vicious or dangerous dogs-that,is enjoyed by cows, goats, pigs, and sheep.1 Once again, the majority grants clemency to a dog, that the *507lower court found to be vicious and dangerous. As I explained in Robinson v. City of Bluefield, 234 W.Va. 209, 764 S.E.2d 740 (2014), “not all dogs are like the beloved Lassie.” Id., 764 S.E.2d at 748 (Loughry, J., dissenting). I have very fond memories of my childhood companion and faithful dog, “Bozo,”2 and understand that pets often become…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Timothy W. MarklingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Brown v. GobbleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Hearn v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API