State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim Blatt
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLoughry, Justice
Apparently, from the majority’s coign of vantage, the citizens of this State do not deserve the same protection from vicious or dangerous dogs-that,is enjoyed by cows, goats, pigs, and sheep.1 Once again, the majority grants clemency to a dog, that the *507lower court found to be vicious and dangerous. As I explained in Robinson v. City of Bluefield, 234 W.Va. 209, 764 S.E.2d 740 (2014), “not all dogs are like the beloved Lassie.” Id., 764 S.E.2d at 748 (Loughry, J., dissenting). I have very fond memories of my childhood companion and faithful dog, “Bozo,”2 and understand that pets often become…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Timothy W. MarklingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Brown v. GobbleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hearn v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.