Legal Opinion

State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim Blatt

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2015No. 14-0757PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENJAMIN, Justice:

The Circuit Court of Wayne County ordered that Tinkerbell, a female pit bull terrier be destroyed pursuant to West Virginia’s vicious dog statute, W. Va.Code § 19-20-20 (1981), after she injured a neighbor child who was playing in the yard of Michael and Kim Blatt. Tinkerbell is the family pet of the Blatts.

The circuit court’s decision ordering that Tinkerbell be destroyed relied on a presumption that pit bull dog breeds are inherently vicious. Because extensive debate exists over whether scientific evidence and social concerns justify breed-specific presumptions, we…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burgess v. PorterfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Banker v. BankerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Conner v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Peyroux and Others v. HOWARD AND VARION.Supreme Court of the United States · 1833

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cabell County Commission v. Amerisourcebergen Drug CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  2. City of Huntington, West Virginia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  3. Riad v. Brandywine Valley SPCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2024
  4. Riad v. Brandywine Valley SPCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2024
  5. State of West Virginia v. Humane Society of Raleigh CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API