Legal Opinion

Privette v. Privette

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1949PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

An appeal may be taken to this Court only from a “judicial order or determination . . . which affects a substantial right claimed in any action or proceeding; or which in effect determines the action, and prevents a judgment from which, an appeal might be taken; or discontinues the action, or grants or refuses a new trial.” G.S.-1 -ill.

As a general rule an appeal will not lie until there is a final determination of the whole case. Moore v. Hinnant, 87 N.C. 505; S. v. Keeter, 80 N.C. 472; Railroad v. Warren, 92 N.C. 620; Hailey v. Gray, 93 N.C. 195. It lies from an interlocutory order only…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. State v. . KeeterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Cole v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. . WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Utilities Com. v. . Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. First Atlantic Management, Corp. v. Dunlea Realty, Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Cowart v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Jenkins v. TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Gallimore v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API