Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion · Dissent

Utilities Com. v. . Coach Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1DissentStacy, C. J.

BARNHILL and WINBORNE, JJ., concur in dissent. This proceeding originated before the Commissioner of Public Utilities by petition of the plaintiff for a removal of certain restrictions provided in its franchise for operating a passenger motor vehicle between points south of the North Carolina State Line and Asheville, North Carolina, within said State.

The franchise referred to was obtained 10 July, 1933, for the operation of motor vehicles from the South Carolina Line south of Hendersonville, through Hendersonville via Mills River Section, to Asheville, North Carolina. In this franchise the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Rhyne v. . LipscombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Armfield v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
  5. Coltrane v. . LaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Utilities Commission v. . Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. In re StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Privette v. PrivetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API