Legal Opinion

Cole v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1942PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The defendants base their objection to the order of Judge Phillips upon two grounds: first, that the statute, O. S., 1146, authorizing compulsory audit of the books of a private corporation, does not apply to banks, and, second, that the plaintiffs are bound by the ruling of Judge Pless denying their previous motion for an audit at the expense of the bank.

Neither of these objections can be sustained. The statute is primarily concerned with- the protection of the rights of minority stockholders, and has reference to private corporations as distinguished from municipal, public, or quasi public…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Penn-Allen Cement Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Tar Heel Hosiery Mill v. Durham Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Hinton v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Leak v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Cowart v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Privette v. PrivetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Jenkins v. TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API