Legal Opinion

Gallimore v. State Highway & Public Works Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1955PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Does the clerk have jurisdiction to rule on a motion to strike interposed under G.S. 1-153? Disposition of these appeals does not require an answer to this question. However, we note that this statute provides: “Any such motion to strike any matter out of any pleading may, upon ten days’ notice to the adverse party, be heard out of term by the resident judge of the district or by any judge regularly assigned to hold the courts of the district.” Too, the prejudicial effect of objectionable allegations in a pleading ordinarily arises from the reading of such allegations to the jury even though…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line R. R. v. WickerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  5. State Highway & Public Works Commission v. HartleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. City of Charlotte v. Charlotte Park & Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Williams v. STATE HIGHWAY COM. OF NORTH CAROLINASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Board of Transportation v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Robinson v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API